Zellstoff Celgar Ltd. v. Public and Private Workers of Canada, Local 1 (Negreiff Grievance), [2017] B.C.C.A.A.A. No. 53

In the context of a privacy-related grievance, we successfully argued that, as there is no fruit of the poison tree doctrine in British Columbia, admissions of employees made to an employer during an investigation were admissible. The arbitrator agreed and admitted the inculpatory admissions made by the employees.

Previous
Previous

Ensign v. Price’s Alarms, 2017 BCSC 2137

Next
Next

Badesha v. Snowland Sporting Goods Ltd. et al., 2016 BCCA 294